Legal Opinion

Delaney v. Delaney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This suit was hied by the petitioners to renew a judgment, formerly entered against the respondent, and for execution of said judgment on equities of the respondent in land that he owned at the time of the filing of this bill. The Chancellor rendered judgment in favor of the petitioner and other distributees of Mrs. Bettie Delaney, deceased, against the respondent. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reluctantly reversed because in their judgment, a judgment could not now be rendered on this former judgment because the bill as filed was repugnant and the 10 year Statute of Limitations, Code,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitson, Admr. v. T.C. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Burns v. Peoples Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Mosier v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  4. Hurt v. FisherTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Brandon v. MasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  2. Gogan v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hollis v. State ex rel. VaughanTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  5. Hill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API