State ex rel. Miller's Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Sanders
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
FINCH, Judge.
This is a consolidation of two original proceedings in prohibition which seek to prevent respondent from taking any further action in two cases filed in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis.1 The basis of relator’s contention is that under § 508.-040,2 the applicable venue statute, venue in these two cases does not lie in the City of St. Louis and respondent should have sustained relator’s motions to dismiss for lack of venue. We now make permanent the provisional rule in prohibition heretofore issued, prohibition being an appropriate remedy where venue is improper. State…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gardner Engineering Corporation v. Page Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Hill v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Crenshaw v. Great Central Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Textured Fibres, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
- Rippstein v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. K-Mart Corp. v. HolligerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Edwards v. State Farm Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State ex rel. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. KoehrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State ex rel. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. KoehrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992