Legal Opinion

Beberman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 4, 2017No. 17-179Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se; Equal Pay Act; 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (2012); Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (2012); RCFC 12(h)(3).

ORDER

PATRICIA CAMPBE LL-SMITH, Judge

Pro se plaintiff, Julie Beberman, an employee of the United States Department of State (State Department), brings this action under the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (Equal Pay Act), Pub. L. No. 88-38, § 3(d), 77 Stat. 56 (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (2012)), alleging gender-based discrimination in pay and benefits. See Compl. (2017 CFC Compl.) ¶¶ 1, 25, 29, ECF No. 1. Ms. Beberman alleges that the government discriminated against her by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Brandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API