Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bierman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 1966No. 32495PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDDY, Judge.
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, hereinafter referred to as Hartford, filed its claim in the St. Louis County Probate Court against the Estate of Isaac T. Bierman. The first claim filed was not served on the executors. A subsequent claim was filed by Hartford, denominated “Supplemental Claim,” and copies thereof were served on the executors on July 10 and 14, 1963.
The executors moved to dismiss the claim in the Probate Court on the grounds that it had not been filed within the time permitted by law for the filing of claims, and that it had not been properly served on the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miller v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1843
- Clarke v. OrganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- North v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- United States Ex Rel. Wilhelm v. ChainSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Kimpton v. SpellmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edgehill Corporation v. HutchensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Orphant v. OrphanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Department of Social Services v. BowlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Department of Social Services v. BowlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988