State v. Swank
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtStiger, J.
About noon on September 29, 1939, Arthur Geifman, a young man 22 years of age, employed as a clerk in Henry’s Shoe Store in Ottumwa, Iowa, was found in a dying condition back of the cash register in the shoe store. He had been shot through the head. The wound caused his death about 1:30 in the afternoon of September 29th.
I. Defendant’s principal contention here is that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. The State’s case rests on circumstantial evidence. Defendant did not testify.
We will refer to a portion of the State’s evidence.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. CaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- People v. RongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- State v. GruberIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. PellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946