Legal Opinion

Duval v. Busch

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 27, 1888Published

1Opinion of the CourtPitshke, J.

Plaintiff moves, for final judgment on the defendant’s alleged failure to serve an amended answer.

The original pleadings were a verified complaint and a duly verified answer, served September 6, 1887. In February, 1888, plaintiff’s attorney (without procuring any order allowing it), transmitted an amended complaint to the defendant’s attorney herein, which was not verified. The want of verification of the same constituted no objection, however, as it was not a “subsequent pleading” within the meaning of section 523, Code Civil Procedure. Hempstead v. Hempstead, 7 How. Pr., 8.

It appeared upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Robertson v. RobertsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1880
  3. Hempstead v. HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1852

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API