Legal Opinion

Wynne v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided May 27, 1992No. 07-89-0221-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Found guilty of the offense of murder and punished by confinement for 55 years, appellant Lafayette Russell Wynne seeks a reversal and remand by both a motion and five points of error. The motion is based on the failure to provide a complete statement of facts, and the points are appellant’s contentions that the trial court erred in denying his motion to change venue, in allowing his cross-examination on certain matters, and in its factual findings and legal conclusions concerning the unavailability of the statement of facts of the venue hearing. On the rationale…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Saldivar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. State v. GoreeNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Dubose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  4. Charles R. Branch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  5. Charles R. Branch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API