Garrett v. McAtee
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This litigation involves the right to the possession of a grain hinder, which had been owned by Vander Garrett, and the controlling question in the ease is the one of fact, To whom did he sell it?
■ The cause was submitted under instructions to which no objections are made, .but it is insisted that the jury did not follow the instructions, and that the verdict returned is unsupported by the evidence.
The testimony cannot be reconciled. The question presented for our decision is whether the testimony tending to support the verdict is sufficient for that, purpose.
The testimony on the part of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Person v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Titsworth v. FrauenthalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nye v. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Oldman v. Melton, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Akins v. PierceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Smith v. Checker Cab CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945