City of New York v. Chelsea Jute Mills
City of New York Municipal Court
Action to recover a statutory penalty. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoesch, J.
This is an action to recover a statutory penalty. As it is a test case, upon the outcome of which many others depend and is the first of its ¡kind in this State, a full examination of the questions involved will be attempted.
It is within the jurisdiction of the court under section 1, subdivision 7, and section 25, subdivision 4, of the Municipal Court Act.
It is brought pursuant to the provisions of the Consolidated School Law, section 5, title 16, chapter 556, Laws of 1894, amended by section 4, chapter 459, Laws of 1903, which went into effect on May 7, 1903.
The language of the statute…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People v. . PiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. . KiblerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Marino v. . LehmaierNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Inland Steel Co. v. YedinakIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Beauchamp v. Sturges & Burn Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Casteel v. Pittsburg Vitrified Paving & Building Brick Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Kowalczyk v. Swift & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.