Legal Opinion

(PC) Gomez v. CDCR

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 1, 2023No. 2:20-cv-00198Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALFREDO GOMEZ, No. 2:20-cv-0198 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, and is now before the court for consideration of the 21 supplemental filing submitted by plaintiff in relation to his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Northstar Financial Advisors Inc. v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API