Legal Opinion

219 East 69th Street Tenants Association v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to petitioners’ contention, the record before DHCR permitted it to rationally and reasonably find that, other than seven apartments where defective window installations were found, the remaining apartments were subject to an MCI rent increase based on the window installations (compare Matter of Ansonia Residents Assn. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 75 NY2d 206 [1989], with Matter of Weinreb Mgt. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 305 AD2d 207 [2003]). DHCR providently exercised its discretion in attempting to inspect only those apartments…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ansonia Residents Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. 370 Manhattan Ave. Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Weinreb Management v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 445 East 80th Street Tenants Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. 445 East 80th Street Tenants Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API