Bullard v. TITUS CONSTRUCTION CO.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtD. S. DeWitt, J.
We granted defendants A. F. Murch Company’s and Pacific Employers Insurance Company’s application for rehearing in this case to consider whether we incorrectly ordered the case remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board for a determination of whether plaintiffs two stepchildren are dependents in fact. We now conclude that remand was unnecessary.
In this Court’s original opinion, 118 Mich App 631; 325 NW2d 521 (1982), we concluded that plaintiffs two stepchildren did not fit within the conclusive presumption of dependency set forth in MCL 418.353(l)(a)(ii); MSA 17.237(353)(l)(a)(ii).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gusler v. Fairview Tubular ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Gusler v. Fairview Tubular ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Bullard v. Titus Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by1 opinion
- Woods v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984