Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1982No. 16PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress his statement without finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the State had sustained its burden of proving that defendant’s statement was voluntarily given.

The United States Constitution forbids the admission in a criminal trial of a confession coerced from a defendant. Rogers v. Richmond, 365 U.S. 534, 5 L.Ed. 2d 760, 81 S.Ct. 735 (1961). In North Carolina, the legislature has statutorily specified the procedures for determining whether a defendant’s statements are voluntarily made. When the prosecution…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. CorleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API