Legal Opinion
Rudgayzer & Gratt v. LRS Communications, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 29, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously modified so as to delete the provision imposing costs upon plaintiffs counsel; as so modified, affirmed without costs.
In this action pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (47 USC § 227 [TCPA]), plaintiff, a law firm, alleged that defendant had sent it an unsolicited commercial advertising fax transmission in violation of the TCPA (47 USC § 227 [b]). Subsequently, plaintiff moved for summary judgment upon its complaint and was awarded damages of $500 (orders of Bernadette Bayne, J., entered Feb. 28, 2002 and Oct. 1, 2002).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- International Science & Technology Institute, Incorporated v. Inacom Communications, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Putney v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gordon v. MarroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weber v. U.S. Sterling Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Landsman & Funk, P.C. v. Skinder-Strauss AssociatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009