Legal Opinion

Doe, John v. Exxon Mobil Corp

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 12, 2007No. 05-7162PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge.

Exxon Mobil Corporation and several of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (hereinafter “Exxon”) appeal from a district court order denying their motion to dismiss. Exxon argues that the district court should have granted the motion to dismiss because the plaintiffs’ claims are non-justicia-ble political questions. We need not reach the merits of Exxon’s arguments because we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. In the alternative, Exxon has requested that we treat…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. James Owens v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Holocaust Victims of v. OTP BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. McMahon Ex Rel. the Estate of McMahon v. Presidential Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  5. Balintulo v. Daimler AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API