Legal Opinion

County of Santa Clara v. Hiram G.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1984No. S.F. No. 24392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

The father of Jerald C., a minor, appeals from an order requiring reimbursement to the County of Santa Clara for the costs of the care and support of Jerald while in custody.

Jerald was declared a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 6021 and was placed in custody at juvenile hall and boys ranch. He was subsequently committed to the California Youth Authority. The county sought reimbursement under the provisions of section 903 at the rate of $265 per month for juvenile hall and boys ranch custody for periods prior to September 1980, at the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. In Re Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Kirkpatrick v. Aline D.California Supreme Court · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re Jerald C.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Aaron v. GasteloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Los Angeles County Metropolitan etc. v. Yum Yum Donut ShopsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Los Angeles County Metropolitan etc. v. Yum Yum Donut ShopsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API