Legal Opinion

Long v. Girdwood

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1892No. Appeal, No. 181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 181, July T., 1891, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Pbila. Co., March T., 1885, No. 9, on verdict for defendant. Foreign attachment, attaching moneys due defendants. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Plaintiffs testified that they were citizens of the United States, one of Missouri and the other of New York, although domiciled and in business in Canada for many years.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 181, July T., 1891, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Pbila. Co., March T., 1885, No. 9, on verdict for defendant. Foreign attachment, attaching moneys due defendants. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Plaintiffs testified that they were citizens of the United States, one of Missouri and the other of New York, although domiciled and in business in Canada for many years. By agreement of counsel, defendants offered a certified copy of the act and warrant of confirmation, by the sheriff in Scotland, of the trustee of defendant’s estate, certifying that…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice McCollum,

The debt for the collection of which the writ of foreign attachment was issued was contracted in a foreign country. Long and Bisby, who are the plaintiffs in the attachment and the appellants here, are, and since 1863 have been, domiciled at Hamilton in Canada and engaged in business there; the defendants in the attachment are citizens of Scotland and members of the firm of Girdwood & Forrest, wool brokers at Glasgow, which is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,798.85; McCallum, Crease & Sloan who are the garnishees in the attachment and the appellees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bacon, Baldwin & Co. v. Jos. Horne & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Merrick's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. American Co-op. Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wing v. BradnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Hilliard v. Enders & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. DeTurck v. WoelfelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API