Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Blake

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2003No. 2003-1074PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Wilton E. Blake II of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0061255, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1993. On September 27, 2002, we suspended respondent’s license to practice law for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4) upon receiving notice that he had been convicted of four felonies. In re Blake, 96 Ohio St.3d 1519, 2002-Ohio-5089, 775 N.E.2d 860.

{¶ 2} On August 12, 2002, relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, charged respondent with professional misconduct based on the felony convictions and two subsequent misdemeanor convictions. Respondent was served…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BanksOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. PowersOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BeinOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BlankemeyerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MuhlbachOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ZinsOhio Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API