Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1949No. 53 of 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Libellant is here seeking the imposition of the so-called “2 for 1” penalty provisions of R. S. § 4529, 46 U.S.C.A. § 596. He claims that his wages were wrongfully withheld following his services aboard the Steamship Mark Hanna.

*1010Findings of Fact

1. The libellant is Lyle T. Chambers.

2. The respondent is Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

3. The Steamship “Mark Hanna” was owned by United States of America, acting by and -through the United States Maritime Commission, on or about July 28, 1947, and respondent operated said vessel pursuant -to the terms o-f a bareboat charter from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collie v. FergussonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Glandzis v. CallinicosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. The Lake GalewoodDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chambers v. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API