Legal Opinion

People v. Deloney

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 2003No. 1—98—1413, 1—00—0914 consPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

This appeal is before us again because of a supervisory order of the Illinois Supreme Court entered on December 31, 2002, directing this court to vacate and reconsider its previous order in this appeal, People v. Deloney, Nos. 1 — 98—1413, 1 — 00—1914 cons. (July 26, 2002) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23), in light of the supreme court’s recent holding in People v. Boclair, 202 Ill. 2d 89 (2002), which provides that the trial court may not summarily dismiss a postconviction petition solely on the basis of its untimeliness.

The underlying facts of this case have been set forth…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. People v. ReyesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. People v. AlmodovarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. People v. BarcikAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API