Calcaterra v. State

Doyle, Presiding Judge.

After a jury trial, Nakenya L. Calcaterra was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to traffic1 and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute.2 She appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by denying her motion to suppress the evidence because her consent to search was the product of an unreasonably prolonged detention. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On appeal from a ruling on a motion to suppress, we must construe the evidence most favorably to affirming the trial court’s factual findings and judgment. We accept the trial court’s factual and…