Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Oberndorf

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 18, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a psychiatrist residing in California, moves for an order “forbidding” *138the taking of her deposition in New York on the ground that her testimony has already been given in answers to interrogatories propounded by defendants, or in the alternative for an order requiring that such examination be had in Los Angeles, California at the expense of the defendants.

Although plaintiff has already ,'been examined to some extent through interrogatories, the defendant is not thereby precluded from seeking her examination by deposition.1 From the nature of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worth v. Trans World Films, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hohner v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. O'Hara v. United States Lines Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  3. Franchise Programs, Inc. v. Mr. Aqua Spray, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API