Legal Opinion

St. Hilaire v. DeBlois

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 30, 1998No. 97-227PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Defendant Lisa St. Hilaire DeBlois appeals from a superior court judgment in favor of her former spouse, plaintiff Michael St. Hilaire. The superior court ruled that DeBlois had fraudulently misrepresented the fact that St. Hilaire was the biological father of the minor children born during the marriage, and awarded damages of $15,500 representing the amount of child support that St. Hilaire had previously paid under a support order in the divorce decree. DeBlois contends, and we agree, that the civil fraud action was barred as an impermissible collateral attack on the parties’ divorce…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tudhope v. RiehleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Lerman v. LermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. Lyon v. LyonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Isham v. IshamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Callaert v. CallaertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. JimenezColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Iannarone v. LimoggioSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. O'Connell-Starkey v. StarkeySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Schwartz v. HaasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Nicola Weaver v. David WeaverSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API