Legal Opinion

Willbanks v. Byrd-Matthews Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 1, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Jones. White superior court. October 13, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. A deed conveying a described tract of land contained, at the conclusion of the descriptive clause, the following provision: “This deed does not convey any timber rights held by the said M. A. Westmoreland” (the grantor). Held, that the title to none of the timber passed to the grantee, but remained in the grantor. Shaw v. Henderson Lumber Co., 141 Ga. 77 (3) (80 S. E. 322). The burden of proof being upon the plaintiff who relied for title upon a deed, containing a *751provision as set out above, the judge did not err, in the trial of an action of quare clausum fregit, for damages for cutting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Henderson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Saunders v. RaineySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Walton v. BusbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Arnold v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API