Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Longer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Washington District Court. — IIoN. D. Ryah, Judge. This is a proceeding to secure tbe probate of an instrument purporting to be tbe will of Wenzel Longer, deceased. Tbe probate was contested and refused, and from such judgment tbe proponents appeal.-

1Opinion of the CourtWatbeMAN, J.

Tbe instrument offered for probate was as follows:

“February 17,1897. I agree to will to Rosie Hineik four hundred and fifty dollars $450.00. Jim Longer a bouse and lot in Riverside. Any Marek two hundred and fifty dollars $250.00. Barbara Fouchek three hundred dollars $300.00. Mary Hotz five dollars $5.00. Jose Hinek one hundred and fifty dollars $150.00. Fannie Parizk five hundred dollars $500.00. And what remains to Jim Longer’s children. The funeral expensis is to be paid by Jim Longer.
“Witnesses Yaclav Longer.
“Justice of the Peace
“Ed. Stackman.
“Jozef Babas.”

Among other objections urged by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wescott v. BinfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Lautenshlager v. LautenshlagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Baldwin v. . HumphreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Martin v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clay v. LaytonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In Re Estate of RamthunSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Pass v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  4. First Presbyterian Church v. DennisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Ransom v. SiglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API