Legal Opinion

Scholl v. Stacy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 21, 2007No. 1060112PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sarah Scholl, a cotrustee of the family trust created in the will of Maxine Krout Murphy, deceased, appeals the trial court's judgment interpreting the language of Murphy's will regarding the creation and the order of the funding of the spousal and family trusts and ordering that the spousal trust be funded first. We reverse the judgment and remand.

Facts and Procedural Background

Maxine Krout Murphy died on December 23, 2001. Her will, executed on September 16, 1996, was admitted to probate on January 29, 2002. Pursuant to a provision in the will, M.C. Murphy, Murphy's surviving spouse, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brittain v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. BT Securities Corp. v. WR Huff Asset Management Co., LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Kershaw v. KershawSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Barnett v. Estate of AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Galin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKnight v. WayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Caplan v. BenatorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  3. Caplan v. BenatorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  4. Smith v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API