Legal Opinion

Haupt Lumber Co. v. Westman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by Nellie M. Weide, one of the defendants, from a judgment of the District Court of Eamsey County, Cornish, J., entered November 7, 1891. The plaintiff, the Haupt Lumber Company, on March 18, 1890, and between that day and May 1, 1890, sold and delivered to defendant John Westman lumber of the value of $419.57, which he used in performing his contract to build a two-story frame dwelling house for defendant George G. Berg, on a lot in Stinson’s Division to St. Paul.

Read the full summary

Appeal by Nellie M. Weide, one of the defendants, from a judgment of the District Court of Eamsey County, Cornish, J., entered November 7, 1891. The plaintiff, the Haupt Lumber Company, on March 18, 1890, and between that day and May 1, 1890, sold and delivered to defendant John Westman lumber of the value of $419.57, which he used in performing his contract to build a two-story frame dwelling house for defendant George G. Berg, on a lot in Stinson’s Division to St. Paul. He commenced to do work and obtain material on March 18, 1890. This Lumber Company in due time made and filed a statement…

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Plaintiff corporation brought this action to enforce its lien claim for materials furnished and used in the erection of a dwelling house on a city lot. The facts were not in controversy. On January 6, 189 0, Mrs. Weide, a defendant, was the owner of the lot in question. She was engaged in quite an extensive business; among other things, that of buying and selling real estate and erecting houses thereon. Her husband, J. E. Weide, also a defendant, was her general agent, managing and conducting all her business. *401About the day last mentioned be entered into a written agreement with one Berg, by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Althen v. TarboxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Hill v. AldrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. v. HeiplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Glass v. FreeburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Newlin v. HoytSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. R.B. Thompson, Jr. Lumber Co. v. Windsor Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API