Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1901No. 2404PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Shelby. Tried below before Hon. Tom C. Davis. Appeal from a conviction for violating local option; penalty, a fine of $35.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $35.

The facts show that appellant, owner of a distillery, made a trade with prosecuting witness, by which he would exchange a pint of brandy for every bushel of peaches witness would furnish him at his distillery.

The trade was carried out. Prosecuting witness delivered the peaches, and subsequently obtained from appellant fifty-six pints of peach brandy in payment for fifty-six bushels of peaches furnished. The question presented is whether or not this is a.sale under…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. State v. . WestmorelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API