Continental Aviation Corp. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

THOMAS, Justice.

This court accepted jurisdiction of this case under Sec. 4(2), Art. V of the Constitution, F.S.A., for the purpose of resolving any confusion that might have arisen, or might still exist, in respect of the question whether nonsuits arc or are not.

Both parties in their briefs stated their awareness that there were cases then pending in this court in which the existence of nonsuits was challenged.

It is important to note that all the briefs in the immediate case were filed before *201our decision in Crews v. Dobson, 177 So.2d 202, was released, 7 July 1965. In that opinion we…