Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

PIZANO v. LACEY & ASSOCIATES, LLC

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 2016No. 112,538PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.

¶ 1 The issue is whether Andrea Rosa Pi-zano, plaintiff/appellee, was required to file a pre-lien notice pursuant to 42 O.S.2011, § 142.6, to perfect her mechanic’s lien against the real property owned by. Lacey & Associates, LLC, defendanVappellant.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE

¶2 In 2012, Lacey & Associates, LLC, (Lacey), .contracted with Everest Homes, LLC, (Everest), to purchase a commercial building. In addition, Lacey and Everest executed an escrow agreement on October 5, 2012, for the release of additional funds to Everest if the roof was replaced after title had transferred to Lacey. After…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Purcell Investments, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. W. E. Caldwell Co. v. John Williams-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. PIZANO v. LACEY & ASSOCIATES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API