Legal Opinion

Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty., No. Jv-508801

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 25, 1995No. 1 CA-JV 94-0063, 1 CA-JV 94-0081 and 1 CA-JV 95-0010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

Each appellant was adjudicated a delinquent child based on allegations that he had molested another child. The juvenile court placed each appellant on probation and, at the request of the State, ordered as a condition of probation that the juvenile provide a blood sample to the Arizona DNA Identification System. Each appeal challenges only the legality of the DNA-testing order. We conclude that the juvenile court lacks authority to enter those orders.

The appeals are factually unrelated but’ consolidated because they present only the same legal issue. There is no need to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. State v. MarquezArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-128676Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Webb v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Aaron M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. In Re John G.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. In Re Abraham F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. In Re Abraham F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty., No. Jv-508801Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API