Legal Opinion

Washington v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1988No. 86-1638PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

In this case of first impression, appellant challenges his conviction for driving while intoxicated. D.C. Code § 40-716(b)(l) (1986). This court has not previously had occasion to address the so-called “per se” provision of § 40-716(b)(l), which classifies as “intoxicated” a person who drives a vehicle while his or her blood contains at least .10 percent, by weight, of alcohol. Appellant raises two issues on appeal. First, he contends that the trial court deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by denying his request that the government produce at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. TannerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Herman L. Womack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  5. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  2. Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Stevenson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Ransford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API