Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although defendant has appealed from his judgment of conviction, the only issue he raises relates to the court’s denial of his postjudgment CPL 420.40 motion that sought a financial hardship hearing to defer or vacate the mandatory surcharges and fees that had been imposed at the time of sentence. Although an appeal from a judgment of conviction brings up for review the imposition of fees and surcharges (People v Hernandez, 93 NY2d 261, 268 [1999]), defendant does not challenge the sentencing court’s imposition of these assessments. The order denying the motion was not part of the judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FlandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. FlandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API