Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. City of Pacific Grove

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 2022No. H047705Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/14/22 Modified and Cert. for Partial Pub. 11/14/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAM HOBBS et al., H047705 (Monterey County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 18CV002411) v. CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE et al., Defendants and Respondents. This appeal by plaintiffs William and Susan Hobbs and Donald and Irma Shirkey asks us to hold that defendant City of Pacific Grove (the City)—by granting them one-year licenses to offer residential real properties for short-term vacation rentals— conferred a property right protected…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Geinosky v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API