Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Morgan Stanley & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 8, 2002No. 01 Civ. 8421(RMB)(RLE)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
ELLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On October 15, 2002, plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) requested permission to move to strike portions of defendants’ answer to the amended complaint. The amended complaint was filed on September 5, 2002, and defendants Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. (collectively “Morgan Stanley”) filed an answer on September 23, 2002, adding three new defenses. EEOC argues that Morgan Stanley was not entitled to add defenses that are unresponsive to the amendments to its complaint.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Tralon Corp. v. Cedarapids, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Tokio Marine And Fire Insurance Company Limited v. Employers Insurance Of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Alnoraindus Burton v. Partha GhoshCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Elite Entertainment, Inc. v. Khela Bros. EntertainmentDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Hines v. City of AlbanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Palmer v. Monroe County SheriffDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.