Legal Opinion

Bain Peanut Co. v. Pinson and Guvner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1931No. Application No. 17123, Motion No. 9436PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

Plaintiff in error has filed a motion for an order nunc pro tunc correcting the order heretofore entered by this Court dismissing its application for a writ of error.

It is true, as contended by plaintiff in error, that its failure to file an application for writ of error within thirty days from July 12, 1929, on which date the Court of Civil Appeals vacated its initial judgment and entered a more onerous judgment against plaintiff in error, was not regarded as defeating the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to revise by writ of error such more onerous judgment. In our opinion, the Court of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schleicher v. RungeTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State of Texas v. GallardoTexas Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oil Field Haulers Ass'n v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Doctors Hospital Facilities v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Reynolds v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ratcliff v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Oil Field Haulers Ass'n v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API