People v. Wilson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*765The defendant’s contention that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the convictions of murder in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that those convictions were supported by legally sufficient evidence (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]). Further, upon our independent review of the evidence, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt on those charges was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007];…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. CedenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. RichbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. CedenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014