Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Winsor v. Sequoia Benefits and Insurance Services LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 1, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00227Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RACHAEL WRIGHT WINSOR, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00227-JSC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 SEQUOIA BENEFITS & INSURANCE Re: Dkt. No. 60 SERVICES LLC, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs, current and former participants in RingCentral, Inc.’s Welfare Benefits Plan, 14 allege that Defendants engaged in an unlawful kickback scheme as fiduciaries of the Plan.1 The 15 Court previously dismissed Plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of Article III standing, granting leave to 16 amend. (Dkt. No.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API