Legal Opinion

Lachhonna v. Consolidated Edison Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alan J. Saks, J.), entered March 7, 1989, which, after jury trial, inter alia, found in favor of third-party defendant Madison Detective Bureau dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed. The appeal from the order of the same court (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered October 24, 1988, is dismissed in view of the entry of final judgment, with costs.

The IAS court did not err in determining that the indemnification clause in a contract between Con Edison and Madison, requiring Madison to provide a uniformed security guard at Con Edison’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kendall v. Venture Development, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Ruszkowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Stroschine v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Mancusi v. Avalonbay Communities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Mancusi v. Avalonbay Communities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API