Paolucci v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge. ANNE.E. COVEY.
I respectfully dissent. The Majority’s statement of the issue on page 1234 of its opinion was not raised either explicitly or implicitly by Claimant. Nor did Claimant raise the two issues the Majority sets forth on page 1238.
Moreover, I strenuously disagree with the Majority dramatically changing well-established precedent and imposing upon employers newly created requirements. Respectfully, this case is not one of first impression. The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s' (UCBR) findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hessou v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Claudio v. Regents of University of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Eckman v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Umedman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Geesey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.