Legal Opinion

Rutland Railroad v. Doud

Franklin County Court

Decided April 22, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

The action was tried in Justice Court without a jury and resulted in a decision for the plaintiff in the sum claimed. Appeal was taken to the County Court for a new trial. At the trial in County Court at the close of the evidence a motion was made by the plaintiff for a directed verdict, which was denied for the purpose of submitting the case to the jury. It was so submitted and resulted in a verdict of no cause of action. Motion was thereupon made to set aside the verdict as against the law and the evidence and for a new trial. Such motion is now entertained.

*45The undisputed facts were that on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Germania Fire Insurance v. Memphis & Charlestown RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Long v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Bishop v. Empire Transportation Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1873
  4. Porter v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API