Rutland Railroad v. Doud
Franklin County Court
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.
The action was tried in Justice Court without a jury and resulted in a decision for the plaintiff in the sum claimed. Appeal was taken to the County Court for a new trial. At the trial in County Court at the close of the evidence a motion was made by the plaintiff for a directed verdict, which was denied for the purpose of submitting the case to the jury. It was so submitted and resulted in a verdict of no cause of action. Motion was thereupon made to set aside the verdict as against the law and the evidence and for a new trial. Such motion is now entertained.
*45The undisputed facts were that on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Germania Fire Insurance v. Memphis & Charlestown RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Long v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Bishop v. Empire Transportation Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1873
- Porter v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920