Legal Opinion

Branch v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 12, 1996No. 87717Published

1Per curiam

We have for review a decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

DOES THE DECISION IN CONEY APPLY TO “PIPELINE CASES,” THAT IS, THOSE OF SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS WHOSE CASES WERE PENDING ON DIRECT REVIEW OR NOT YET FINAL DURING THE TIME CONEY WAS UNDER CONSIDERATION BUT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE OPINION?

Branch v. State, 671 So.2d 224, 224 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We answered this question in Boyett v. State, No. 81,971, — So.2d —[1996 WL 693616] (Fla. Dec. 5,1996). There we wrote:

In Coney [v. State, 653…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Boyett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Branch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API