Legal Opinion

Bankston v. Guzman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1989No. 88-837PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOTION TO DISMISS

KNOLL, Judge.

Defendants-appellees, Wilbert Saucier and Edward Kaplan, move to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff-appellant, Mary Bank-ston, on the ground that appellant seeks review of interlocutory judgments which do not cause appellant irreparable injury.

Appellant filed a Motion and Order for Appeal in the trial court seeking an appeal of “judgments signed and rendered on February 29 and the last judgment on the 25 day of April, 1988 ...” This order was granted. The record indicates that on February 29,1988, the trial court rendered and signed a judgment which rescinded a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Daigle & Hinson Rambler, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Williams v. City of BastropLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Williams v. City of BastropLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Bankston v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. KleinpeterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Cobb v. KleinpeterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Mavis S. Stephens v. Paul David Strahan, II, Et Ux.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Stephens v. StrahanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API