Jaynes v. United States
United States Court of Claims
On the Proofs. The Reporters* statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The claimant, Allan B. Jaynes, was clerk of the District Court of the United States for the First Judicial District of the Territory of Arizona from October 6, 1906, to December 31, 1910, duly qualified and acting. II.
Read the full summary
On the Proofs. The Reporters* statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The claimant, Allan B. Jaynes, was clerk of the District Court of the United States for the First Judicial District of the Territory of Arizona from October 6, 1906, to December 31, 1910, duly qualified and acting. II. For services during said period on behalf of the United States, claimant made up his supplemental account and the same, duly verified by his oath, was presented to the United States court for approval in the presence of the district attorney, and an order…
1Opinion of the Court
Peelle, Cb. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court:
The claim herein is for per diems for entering and docketing petitions in naturalization cases upon the assumption or theory that the court was open as in admiralty, equity, and bankruptcy proceedings. United States v. Marvin (212 U. S., 275); United States v. Finnell (185 U. S., 236); Owen v. United States (41 C. Cls., 69); and Marvin v. United States (45 C. Cls., 528).
Section 6 of the act of June 29,1906 (34 Stat. L., 596, 598), so far as material here reads:
“ That petitions for naturalization may be made and filed during term time or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. FinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Owen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1906
- United States v. MarvinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Marvin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910