Legal Opinion

Pascarella v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered October 13, 1999, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly granted since plaintiffs failed to submit competent evidence that defendant had either actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazard, i.e., creamy perfume on the floor of its cosmetics department, prior to plaintiff’s alleged slip and fall. Alleged statements by unidentified employees of defendant purportedly made to plaintiff, that they had seen the foreign…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loschiavo v. Port Auth. of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Cassanova v. General Cinema Corp. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Candela v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Rosado v. Phipps Houses Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. East County Recycling, Inc. v. Pneumatic Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API