Legal Opinion

City of Peoria v. Peoria Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Chester F. Barnett, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

An ordinance was passed for widening the south end of Knoxville avenue, in the city of Peoria, from thirty-three feet to sixty-six feet for a distance of about eight hundred feet, for condemnation of the necessarv land and for putting the surface of the avenue in condition for public travel. The ordinance provided that the improvement, the compensation for private property and the whole cost thereof, excluding the estimate of the engineer, amounting to $1600, should be paid for by special assessment. The petition for the improvement was 'filed in the county court and an assessment roll was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuehner v. City of FreeportIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. City of Chicago v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. City of Rockford v. MowerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Drainage District No. 1 v. GoembelIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Monticello v. LeCroneIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. City of Chicago v. LordIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Commissioners of McGee Creek Levee & Drainage District v. SidesIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Village of Northbrook v. SteerupIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API