Legal Opinion

George J. Smith & Sheila Ann Smith v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 3, 2019No. 6105-16Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2019-111

UNITED STATES TAX COURT GEORGE J. SMITH AND SHEILA ANN SMITH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6105-16. Filed September 3, 2019. Ps omitted from their income tax returns amounts they received as interest and for work performed. Ps claim that, because R assessed I.R.C. sec. 6702 frivolous return penalties, he must make I.R.C. sec. 6020(b)(1) substitute returns for Ps before he can claim the returns they filed are incorrect. Ps also argue that they were not employees within the meaning of I.R.C. ch. 21 (Federal Insurance Contributions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  2. Hartman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  3. Charles J. Martin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Alton M. Parker, Sr. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Irwin A. Schiff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API