Legal Opinion

Barby Energy Corp. v. Marlin Oil Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1999No. 91,274Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARL B. JONES, Chief Judge:

¶ 1 On September 8,1997, the trial court, pursuant to a settlement agreement, gave judgment to Appellant, Barby Energy Corporation. The order stated that Barby should have judgment for costs, exclusive of attorney fees “permitted under 12 O.S. §§ 1106, 928, 942 or any other applicable law, the amount to be determined by the Court.” On November 7, 1997, Barby filed its motion to assess costs. Marlin received Barby’s motion and the same day advised his counsel that the motion was untimely filed.

¶ 2 At hearing on Barby’s motion, Marlin argued strenuously that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Victore Insurance Co. v. FosterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API