Legal Opinion

Williams v. Fauver

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1972No. 43272Published

1Per curiam

Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission denying workmen’s compensation benefits to relator, who had been employed by respondent Zumbro Beauty Shop.

Two competent medical witnesses appeared at the hearing before the compensation judge. The one called by the employee-relator was of the opinion that the disease which disables relator was probably caused by use in her employment of a certain hair spray. The medical witness called by respondents expressed the opinion that there was no connection between the disease and relator’s employment. We have held on previous…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Henrichs v. Essig Cooperative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API