Legal Opinion
Talcove v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for libel, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), entered December 5, 1996, as granted the motion of the defendant Buckeye Pipe Line Company to dismiss the amended complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Eric W. Sustad cross-appeals from so much of *465the same order as dismissed his cross claim against the defendant Buckeye Pipe Line Company.
Orde…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Morales v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Orzechowski v. Warner-Lambert Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- DiSpigna v. Lutheran Medical Center ParkingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fucile v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Mosher v. BainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Gonzalez v. 17 Murray Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2001
- Hamer v. FPG Am., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Hartley v. R.E. Leveillee Woodworking, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.